Children
die every day at the hands of people like Matthew.
Not
all paedophiles are like Matthew. Like all groups of
people, like punks, like feminists, like Muslims, like all the other
groups people make across-the-board assumptions about, viewed from a
distance the group is homogenous. When you get closer, when you look
harder, it fragments into separate and distinct camps. Look even
closer and the camps fragment again; people are fractals. For
example, one can learn a lot just from Wikipedia. Not always a
reliable source, to be sure, but for things like scientific
classifications it's usually reliable as these are things which are
easy to spot and update and wiki-geeks thrive on that kind of thing.
Wikipedia
tells us that Holmes and Holmes, 2002, looked at types of paedophile
and their psychological profiles and came up with seven
classifications.
Situational
Does
not prefer children, but offends under certain conditions.
Regressed
Typically
has relationships with adults, but a stressor causes them to seek
children as a substitute.
Morally
indiscriminate
All-around
sexual deviant who may commit other sexual offenses unrelated to
children, otherwise meaning some rapists are so into raping they
pretty much tend to rape everything that stands still long enough.
Naive/inadequate
Often
mentally disabled in some way, finds children less threatening.
(Having learning difficulties unfortunately does not preclude
having physical sexual feelings. As a society we like to pretend it
does, and we make no allowances for the sexuality of people who are
physically or mentally disabled. Because people with learning
difficulties are not very good at the finer points of social
interaction, their response to frustration is to act to relieve it.
A lot of the time they genuinely don't understand why they are not
allowed to do so, or that they're harming the other person. My
personal opinion is that people who fall into this particular group
could probably benefit from some kind of government-sponsored sex
worker scheme, but I don't think Britain is there yet. And nor are
we likely to be there any time soon.)
Preferential
Has
true sexual interest in children, ie a fixed orientation emerging
before or during puberty and stable over time. Still is
non-consensual and causes significant harm, though, so let's not
start making coming-out banners for paedophiles just yet.
Mysoped
Sadistic
and violent, targets strangers more often than acquaintances. Why,
hello there Matthew. You have your own classification. How nice for
you. Did you know I still have a knife scar on the left side of my
ribcage?
Fixated
Little
or no activity with adults of own age, described as an "overgrown
child."
Interesting.
Even with this basic information, we already see the fractals.
We see that an autistic man who has no understanding of his crime and
offended because he was sexually frustrated should be handled
differently from a sociopath like Jimmy Savile who offends because he
can.
As
a society we will blame everyone else rather than deal with the human
reality of paedophiles.
We
rave and rant at the social worker who should have removed the child.
The legal system which lets sex offenders out. The mental health
worker who should have picked up on the signs. The teacher who should
have seen the bruises. All these cries for heads to roll and local
authority witch hunts and we ignore the elephant in the room.
A
paedophile is not a monster, but an adult human being. He or she
makes a decision to force sexual contact on a pre-sexual human. And
that decision belongs to that person. It's not anything to do with
anyone else. Other people should keep an eye out, yes. They should be
aware of the signs. But the majority of the blame has to rest
squarely on the shoulders of the person who fantasised about child
sex abuse, planned how to do it, and then did it.
We
are freaked out by sex offenders - and so we should be. They are
terrifying. They damage people for life. They scare people. They
physically hurt people. Sometimes their desires are so extreme that
they can only be satisfied by murder. No-one wants to admit sex
offenders are just another facet of humanity. That's even more scary
than monsters.
We
lock them up and throw away the key. We pretend they don't exist,
they don't have needs, they're not people, they're not there. As a
society, we are doing the equivalent of thinking that if we just
stand still and keep our eyes closed for long enough the bogeyman
will go away.
This
does not work. It's not a question of right or wrong. Or a question
of what "should" or "shouldn't" happen. It simply
does not work. It doesn't work just like the much-vaunted war on
drugs doesn't work. Shouting "But you shouldn't take drugs!"
at people does not change the fact that they do take drugs, and
debate about whether drug laws are "right" or "wrong"
does not change the fact that they don't work. They do not work. I
could make two phone calls and be off my face on pretty much anything
I chose to ask for within three hours. So could you, whoever you are,
whether you move in druggy circles or not. If you think about your
circle of friends and acquaintances, I bet you can think of someone
to call. Or someone who would know someone to call. No matter how
straight you are, if your life depended on getting some coke, or some
heroin, or some acid or whatever - you could have it in your hands
within three hours. It is a huge and stupid waste of time and money
and it does not work. Neither do the laws against prostitution.
Neither does any other law our society has put in place to eradicate
an aspect of humanity it doesn't want to admit exists.
Why
paedophiles happen, we don't know. No-one knows. Whether it's
genetic, a product of upbringing or a rare combination of various
factors is not understood. But the fact remains they are there. They
exist. Pretending they aren't human - that they are a monster in the
shadows - is pointless.The problem needs to be engaged with, because
if it isn't engaged with it can't be solved or contained. The only
way we will ever understand why these people exist and what makes
them tick is by looking them straight in the eye, talking to them,
and dealing with what we see. In other words, accepting them as part
of us.
We
can't figure out how to change them until we've stopped being afraid
of looking at them.
One
final point; victims of paedophiles are also people. I am not just a
victim with a scarred ribcage. I am a woman with a job, with friends,
with a cat, a woman who likes Vivienne Westwood shoes and listens to
Bauhaus, a woman who hopes one day to have a family and a home of her
own. A woman who hates being defined by less than an hour spent in
some rhododendrons 27 years ago. You need to see them in proportion,
so you can see us in proportion too. The knife against your throat
doesn't break you, but the media witch hunts and celebrity
confessions, the way everyone goes quiet and treats you like you
might start crying or attack them, the assumption that when you have
been sex abused you will never have an ordinary life, that might.
That just might.
No comments:
Post a Comment